Despite the outcome and the big handful of negatives from last night, I actually was still quite entertained for the majority of it.
I am not sure what that is saying about me that something like last night was entertaining, but. . .
The Good/Suprising:
Drury/Dawes/Prucha line impresses for the second game in a row. I just did not (repeat DID NOT) think this would work. I'm not going to credit Renney for it. Instead I'm going to say that Prucha's coming back into the lineup with spunk and creativity - both sorely lacking on this team - possibly made it easier on whoever he played with. And he's been highly impressive. If he's not scoring, he's making assists now. Got one last night, and came close to two others, making nice passes to Drury and Dawes in the slot. Very good stuff from that line.
The Bad/Surprising:
After a great game on Monday, Hank looked very, very bad last night. No way around that. He should, at times, be tethered to the net for his own protection. See Montreal's first goal as an example. I just do not understand how a goalie who is stellar in shootouts, looks embarassingly human on almost any odd man rush. Don't get it. Just don't get it. Rebounds aplenty, Montreal capitalized, not surprisingly. Whether it was IceCap last night or Hockey This Morning, this morning, someone said that Hank was not having a good year. And numerically that's probably spot on. But I guess in my mind, he's been playing well overall considering being over worked and over tested. But maybe that has faded since the earliest part of the season. I don't know. I'm usually the first to admit when Hank doesn't have it. Is the rest of the team's follys making me blind to our own goalie's hardships?
Marc Staal, who has been in my opinion the single best player all season, looked bad last night. Not just once or twice, but for much of the night overall. And that is going to happen. Off night's happen. It's just he's played so well, it was hard to not notice how he was struggling.
The Rest of It All:
Jaroslav Halak had some masterful saves, and played very well for Montreal. Robert Lang shocked me, honestly, with his performance. Roman Hamrlikand young guy Max Patioretty played well too.
The Habs were 27th on the PP heading into last night's game. And yet they still managed to score two on the Rangers when the Rangers were stupid and vulnerable. It's amazing. I kept telling people, no, the Habs are not a powerplay machine THIS YEAR, it's just when they play NEW YORK that they wake up. And credit them for it. Definitely. The penalties killed the Rangers. End of story.
I do not understand completely the boo-ing of Alex Kovalev. I mean yes he was up/down/here/gone, and while his last tenure was anything but perfect, he got shipped out in the firesale like everyone else. No?
The Not Surprising:
Aaron Voros did not look good. His linemates Dubinsky and Zherdev didn't really look too great either, but I only saw one of them laboring to get back to the bench. More than once. Embarassing. It really is. I like him and I liked him a hell of a lot back in the days of the PS3 line, but come on. He cannot be in the lineup when he can't finish a shift or skate back to the bench without laboring, when you have Lauri Korpikoski, and even Dan Fritsche sitting out. Inexcusable!!!
My favorite part of the game:
Prucha standing up for himself - again - to Maxime Lapierre, who is just after him for some reason. Love the fiesty-ness. I really do. And Prucha becoming - wait for it - a playmaker, and not just a goal scorer. It's really refreshing stuff.
Larry Brooks quote of the day on Pete: "As he has been since brought out of witness protection, Petr Prucha was the Rangers' most creative and best offensive player, not that he gave up anything on the other side of the puck."
Not only has he done nothing remotely defensively liable, if you will, he's been one of the best players since he's coming back to the lineup (not that he did anything wrong before mind you), but he has a four game point scoring streak (2G, 2A). And he's a playmaker now, if you are paying attention Coach Renney!
http://www.nypost.com/seven/01082009/sports/rangers/bad_hab_its_spell_doom_for_rangers_149149.htm
The Rangers have a big test coming up on Friday. Should be interesting to see which team shows up in Buffalo.
Around the League:
Because I was without access to internet yesterday :( I'm a day behind. But, if you missed it, super annoyance Jarkko Ruutu was suspended for two games for biting Andrew Peters earlier this week. I am not sure what to think about this. Apparently, it happens. It used to happen more frequently. But I just can't wrap my head around it. As for Ruutu trying to deny it? Please. What does this really mean besides yet another example of how Ruutu really does physically and not just verbally dance over the line, - - he will be out against the Rangers on Saturday. Last time the Rangers played in Ottawa he was a big reason Ottawa won. Maybe this is the difference maker, if the team comes to play that is.
http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/HomeMainStories/2009/01/07/7947441-ap.html
Mats Sundin made his debut for Vancouver last night to no real fanfare, but a lot of booing from Edmonton. He didn't know why. Did he look unnatural, in blue, white and green? Considering he spent so long in various colors of blue and white, this is not a stretch. Now if he had actually signed with Philly or the Blackhawks, that'd look odd. As is, he looked fine. In uniform at least.
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
A Rare All Around Effort. . .
Where to begin?
No, honestly, where do I begin?
The team actually played well. Captain Drury's self-described best all around team effort so far this year. I am not going to start agreeing with The Boring One, but there is actually not much to complain about. And I won't.
The Rangers scored 2 goals on the powerplay. 2!
The Rangers scored AND didn't give up a short-handed goal!
Hank's first period was outstanding! No other word but - outstanding.
Drury did not pull down Prucha. In fact, for whatever random illogical reason, The Boring One's line actually played better than the other lines. He even scored. Set up with a nice behind the net pass from Prucha, I might add.
Gomez, shockingly, used his speed more effectively.
Orr had a nice fight with Godard. I just wondered to myself why that took so long to start. Jeeze!
Roszival and Mara had pretty complete games.
It was an all-around good effort.
Shockingly.
And even better, the NHL's favorite son, was rendered useless, being boo-ed without mercy from the 400s, and spending much of the game on his rear-end.
:)
Things might not be great in Rangerland, but things are BADDDD in Pitt right now. And you know, for one day, things were better in NY. Not great, but better.
Now, I say that to keep the Rangers win in perspective. They beat a very dismantled team who's captain is going, well, nutso.
So a win, yes. An important win, yes. But, not anything that can't be erased with a crappy effort tomorrow night versus Montreal.
And while I actually really enjoyed the game, I must say, that I hated, slightly that Renney's line changes didn't completely blow up in his face.
That being said, I didn't notice three players last night. Voros, Dubinsky, and Zherdev. At all.
Dubinsky is slumping, that's a fact. Zherdev - again - has moments. One game great, the next - bad. (But tell me that I didn't predict something of this sort happening with him, the Alex Kovalev clone).
So Voros for Korpikoski? Not sure that panned. But because there was a win, I expect they'll all last another game in the lineup.
And that goes for Prucha, who despite an errant four minute double minor for high sticking, had another effective game.
But Montreal, although not at the top of their game right now, has got to be a more formidable opponent than Pitt was. I'd think.
I guess we'll see tomorrow.
Wait, this just in courtesy of the Team990. Jaroslav Halak to start. And apparently half the Habs might be fighting mono??
This just got interesting.
Around the League:
I listened to parts of the Edmonton/Islanders game yesterday on the way home from the Garden. And I found something I heard from Edmonton announcer Rod Phillips very disturbing.
When the Oilers had a powerplay, Denis Grebeshkov missed the puck at the point and it went out of the zone.
Phillips then said "a North American player would have kept that puck in the zone."
Sit on that for a minute.
I don't know if I've heard such a sweeping generalization in a long, long time.
I appreciate that Canadians love their own, certainly. But this type of blantant anti-European thought is counter productive.
These are the people that (sorry again Joe) will vote Thornton over Jagr, just because Jaromir is from Czech Republic. They are the people that might have cringed that a Russian knocked Crosby from the Hart Trophy throne last year. They are the people that attacked the Russians the Cold War ended and they joined the NHL freely for the first time.
Am I generalizing now to make a point? Absolutely.
But while I cannot truly comment on whether this is a continuing trend with Phillips, I can honestly say it did not sit well with me.
His point, for those who didn't listen, was that a North American would put his glove down, or his knee - do anything to stop the puck from going out of the zone.
Obviously he hasn't seen the plethora of bad point men to play for the Rangers in the last decade. I'm sure many were European, but not all of them.
Point taken, Rod. But I simply don't agree with it at all. In theory or in actuality.
No, honestly, where do I begin?
The team actually played well. Captain Drury's self-described best all around team effort so far this year. I am not going to start agreeing with The Boring One, but there is actually not much to complain about. And I won't.
The Rangers scored 2 goals on the powerplay. 2!
The Rangers scored AND didn't give up a short-handed goal!
Hank's first period was outstanding! No other word but - outstanding.
Drury did not pull down Prucha. In fact, for whatever random illogical reason, The Boring One's line actually played better than the other lines. He even scored. Set up with a nice behind the net pass from Prucha, I might add.
Gomez, shockingly, used his speed more effectively.
Orr had a nice fight with Godard. I just wondered to myself why that took so long to start. Jeeze!
Roszival and Mara had pretty complete games.
It was an all-around good effort.
Shockingly.
And even better, the NHL's favorite son, was rendered useless, being boo-ed without mercy from the 400s, and spending much of the game on his rear-end.
:)
Things might not be great in Rangerland, but things are BADDDD in Pitt right now. And you know, for one day, things were better in NY. Not great, but better.
Now, I say that to keep the Rangers win in perspective. They beat a very dismantled team who's captain is going, well, nutso.
So a win, yes. An important win, yes. But, not anything that can't be erased with a crappy effort tomorrow night versus Montreal.
And while I actually really enjoyed the game, I must say, that I hated, slightly that Renney's line changes didn't completely blow up in his face.
That being said, I didn't notice three players last night. Voros, Dubinsky, and Zherdev. At all.
Dubinsky is slumping, that's a fact. Zherdev - again - has moments. One game great, the next - bad. (But tell me that I didn't predict something of this sort happening with him, the Alex Kovalev clone).
So Voros for Korpikoski? Not sure that panned. But because there was a win, I expect they'll all last another game in the lineup.
And that goes for Prucha, who despite an errant four minute double minor for high sticking, had another effective game.
But Montreal, although not at the top of their game right now, has got to be a more formidable opponent than Pitt was. I'd think.
I guess we'll see tomorrow.
Wait, this just in courtesy of the Team990. Jaroslav Halak to start. And apparently half the Habs might be fighting mono??
This just got interesting.
Around the League:
I listened to parts of the Edmonton/Islanders game yesterday on the way home from the Garden. And I found something I heard from Edmonton announcer Rod Phillips very disturbing.
When the Oilers had a powerplay, Denis Grebeshkov missed the puck at the point and it went out of the zone.
Phillips then said "a North American player would have kept that puck in the zone."
Sit on that for a minute.
I don't know if I've heard such a sweeping generalization in a long, long time.
I appreciate that Canadians love their own, certainly. But this type of blantant anti-European thought is counter productive.
These are the people that (sorry again Joe) will vote Thornton over Jagr, just because Jaromir is from Czech Republic. They are the people that might have cringed that a Russian knocked Crosby from the Hart Trophy throne last year. They are the people that attacked the Russians the Cold War ended and they joined the NHL freely for the first time.
Am I generalizing now to make a point? Absolutely.
But while I cannot truly comment on whether this is a continuing trend with Phillips, I can honestly say it did not sit well with me.
His point, for those who didn't listen, was that a North American would put his glove down, or his knee - do anything to stop the puck from going out of the zone.
Obviously he hasn't seen the plethora of bad point men to play for the Rangers in the last decade. I'm sure many were European, but not all of them.
Point taken, Rod. But I simply don't agree with it at all. In theory or in actuality.
Monday, January 5, 2009
Grasping At Straws. . .
Not only does Renney plan to play Prucha with Drury and Dawes, to fully smash any and all confidence he gained in the last few games.
Not only does he justify this by saying it's for benefit of the powerplay!!??
He now decides for "sustainability" reasons to bench Korpikoski - the other young bright spot on the team - for Voros.
Renney is going to ruin whatever little youthful energy this team has and kill another young guy's spirit. He really is.
And to fix the powerplay? Apparently he cared so little about it the last three years it sucked, so how is that even an excuse?
*sigh*
Going to be a long night at MSG. . .
Not only does he justify this by saying it's for benefit of the powerplay!!??
He now decides for "sustainability" reasons to bench Korpikoski - the other young bright spot on the team - for Voros.
Renney is going to ruin whatever little youthful energy this team has and kill another young guy's spirit. He really is.
And to fix the powerplay? Apparently he cared so little about it the last three years it sucked, so how is that even an excuse?
*sigh*
Going to be a long night at MSG. . .
Sunday, January 4, 2009
A Little Slice Of Everything Else. . .
Random Ramblings From Around the League:
-Pat Kane will miss his first game in the last 117, and his first ever since beginning his career with Chicago, today, with a high ankle sprain. :(
- Last night Scott Oake interviewed a Brenden Morrow in street clothes and asked him about the Sean Avery/Distractions/Stars Slow start. Morrow said, "Unfortunately he did take a lot of the blame - whether it was warranted or not."
Not sure if that's a PR type answer, but I found it interesting. Blame Sean Avery all you want, there was more going on in Dallas. And they were playing better. Unfortunately last night's game got them nothing more than a 4-1 loss to once rival Edmonton.
-Sorry I missed all of the opening of HNIC, but I caught After Hours. Looks like there was a story on Andrew Cogliano, Sam Gagner, and Tom Gilbert living together. Those are always the best, because it just shows young guys, being young guys. Good stuff.
World Juniors:
-Quite an ending to the Canadian/Russian tilt last night. Edmonton fan and draft pick, Jordan Eberle, ties the game at 5 with 5.4 seconds to go, to force overtime, and a shootout. Eberle and golden child Jon Tavares would score in the shootout, lifting Canada to the Gold Medal Game against Sweden this week.
The All-Star-Controversy:
What controversy? The NHL gives the fans the right to vote in whomever they want to start the game. That's a fact. Credit the fans of Pittsburgh for wanting so badly to right the ship, that they began voting - and rightfully so - for Malkin and Crosby to be starters for the big game.
You can say that all fans should be more responsible and vote for the best and not the popularity vote. But, come on, now. Most of us who went to high school can attest that just doesn't happen.
Montreal for their 100th anniversary and All-Star game wanted to have all Habs on the roster. Fine. No different than the Yankees fans stuffing their ballot boxes to get way more Yankees than were actually deserving to play in the last All-Star game at the Stadium this past summer.
Is it right? Probably not. But it's not surprising.
The only thing that is perhaps a little off, is anyone trying to justify these players getting selected on merit. NHL.com's writeup where the fans must have looked past Mike Komisarek's numbers to realize what more he has to offer, is just silly. He's a great D-man. But an All-Star this year. . . sorry, no.
The right people will still go. I think people just have to pay less attention to "starters," knowing what they do about how they are selected.
Obviously if I were voting - and no, I did not - Ovechkin and Tim Thomas would have been in there for the East. But I'm confident they'll get to go. Although Boston should have a lot more than one representative, and if Marc Savard does not get a tip, it's yet another year he's overlooked for how great he his.
Guys like Jeff Carter and Zach Parise should also be rewarded for their great years.
For the Rangers, if anyone goes, it should be Hank. If he doesn't want to, Marc Staal should be considered, even if there is no "real" hitting in the game. If anyone else goes from New York, it will be a joke.
Out West, Kane and Toews are fine by me. Obviously. J.S. Giguere is always a favorite, and he'll be going back home. I think there should have definitely been a push for some Sharks or Wings on the starting ballot, but I'm also sure they will be there come game time.
Overall, just keep in mind that it is, merely, what it is. I happen to enjoy All-Star games, for pretty much everything but the actual game. . .the interviews, the mic'd up goalies, the skills competition - even if that has lost some luster. The game itself, after all, means very little. If Montreal wants to live it up, let them. How many other franchises have been around that long and accomplished so many remarkable things. It'll be quite a show, I'm sure.
Rangers:
-If you want Rangers news, pick up the NY Post today. Not only is their the usual 2 articles - Slapshots and a write-up of whatever Rangers game happened Saturday night, but there is an interview with Tom Renney (gasp), and Hank Lundqvist featured on Page Six Magazine.
-I recommend you do not eat anything while reading the Renney interview. It reads much like his post-game interviews. I find it interesting he talks so extensively of 9-11 and how much it meant to him, and continues to mean to him. Perhaps that makes me less surprised he picked a Canadian-molded American for his team captain. Of course his international career in ice hockey make me wonder how happy he is to have 3 Swedes on the team. You'd think the team colors alone would be enough to set him off.
**Random side note, on Renny, btw. I missed this quote from him after Monday's game against the Isles about one Petr Prucha. Courtesy of Ranger Rants and Andrew Gross: http://njmg.typepad.com/rangersblog/2008/12/watch-out.html
"Renney said he expects Petr Prucha to remain in the lineup, at least for the next few games. Renney said he is looking for some "sustainability" out of Prucha's game, meaning he needs to see exactly what he got last night. Prucha has gone in and (mostly) out of the line because he hasn't shown sustainability in his game.
Prucha said he does not and has not wanted to be traded despite his lack of playing time and, for the most part, does not think or worry about the fact that he does not have a contract with the Rangers past this season.
"Not unless you remind me," Prucha said, when I asked him about it.
To which I say, sustainability my @ss!**
-As for the Hank article in Page Six, it's a good read. He is a unique player. A unique person. And as unassuming a superstar as this team may ever see. It's both intriguing and refreshing.
I just hope they don't ruin him!!
-Lastly, Larry Brooks' article on the game speaks about how the Rangers "specialty teams" are anything but "special." They might just cost this team a playoff berth in the end.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/01042009/sports/rangers/special_team_woes_plague_blueshirts_147161.htm
My personal favorite though:
"The shame of it is that the Rangers and the coaching staff seem unable to reverse the season-long follies on the PP. PP? Hey, maybe that's a signal head coach Tom Renney should recognize - PP, as in Petr PruchaPetr Prucha , who scored for the second straight game and is the team's most potent, if unused and thus dormant, weapon with the man advantage.
Of course, it only took half a season for Renney to recognize what Prucha has to offer at even-strength, so it's probably unwise to expect too much. "
So true, Larry. So true.
And what a shame that, of course, Prucha and Valiquette's really solid all around efforts will be lost in yet one more game where their flailing PP lost them a game. And not like they had anything really to do about it. Ideally, a goalie should not be so tested on his team's own PP. And ideally the only guy on this team that has recently scored 16 PP goals in a year, should really be on it.
Sense? Nah, we don't play with sense in Rangerland.
Sad News:
-It's been commented upon, and granted I was a little late to pick up on it, but the news is no less sad today. A tragedy really.
http://tsn.ca/canadian_hockey/story/?id=261626&lid=headline&lpos=topStory_canadian_hockey
If all players, everywhere, have to tighten helmets so this does not happen, so be it. A small price to pay.
Rest in Peace, Don Sanderson. You never like to hear of things like this happening, and hopefully we never will again.
-Pat Kane will miss his first game in the last 117, and his first ever since beginning his career with Chicago, today, with a high ankle sprain. :(
- Last night Scott Oake interviewed a Brenden Morrow in street clothes and asked him about the Sean Avery/Distractions/Stars Slow start. Morrow said, "Unfortunately he did take a lot of the blame - whether it was warranted or not."
Not sure if that's a PR type answer, but I found it interesting. Blame Sean Avery all you want, there was more going on in Dallas. And they were playing better. Unfortunately last night's game got them nothing more than a 4-1 loss to once rival Edmonton.
-Sorry I missed all of the opening of HNIC, but I caught After Hours. Looks like there was a story on Andrew Cogliano, Sam Gagner, and Tom Gilbert living together. Those are always the best, because it just shows young guys, being young guys. Good stuff.
World Juniors:
-Quite an ending to the Canadian/Russian tilt last night. Edmonton fan and draft pick, Jordan Eberle, ties the game at 5 with 5.4 seconds to go, to force overtime, and a shootout. Eberle and golden child Jon Tavares would score in the shootout, lifting Canada to the Gold Medal Game against Sweden this week.
The All-Star-Controversy:
What controversy? The NHL gives the fans the right to vote in whomever they want to start the game. That's a fact. Credit the fans of Pittsburgh for wanting so badly to right the ship, that they began voting - and rightfully so - for Malkin and Crosby to be starters for the big game.
You can say that all fans should be more responsible and vote for the best and not the popularity vote. But, come on, now. Most of us who went to high school can attest that just doesn't happen.
Montreal for their 100th anniversary and All-Star game wanted to have all Habs on the roster. Fine. No different than the Yankees fans stuffing their ballot boxes to get way more Yankees than were actually deserving to play in the last All-Star game at the Stadium this past summer.
Is it right? Probably not. But it's not surprising.
The only thing that is perhaps a little off, is anyone trying to justify these players getting selected on merit. NHL.com's writeup where the fans must have looked past Mike Komisarek's numbers to realize what more he has to offer, is just silly. He's a great D-man. But an All-Star this year. . . sorry, no.
The right people will still go. I think people just have to pay less attention to "starters," knowing what they do about how they are selected.
Obviously if I were voting - and no, I did not - Ovechkin and Tim Thomas would have been in there for the East. But I'm confident they'll get to go. Although Boston should have a lot more than one representative, and if Marc Savard does not get a tip, it's yet another year he's overlooked for how great he his.
Guys like Jeff Carter and Zach Parise should also be rewarded for their great years.
For the Rangers, if anyone goes, it should be Hank. If he doesn't want to, Marc Staal should be considered, even if there is no "real" hitting in the game. If anyone else goes from New York, it will be a joke.
Out West, Kane and Toews are fine by me. Obviously. J.S. Giguere is always a favorite, and he'll be going back home. I think there should have definitely been a push for some Sharks or Wings on the starting ballot, but I'm also sure they will be there come game time.
Overall, just keep in mind that it is, merely, what it is. I happen to enjoy All-Star games, for pretty much everything but the actual game. . .the interviews, the mic'd up goalies, the skills competition - even if that has lost some luster. The game itself, after all, means very little. If Montreal wants to live it up, let them. How many other franchises have been around that long and accomplished so many remarkable things. It'll be quite a show, I'm sure.
Rangers:
-If you want Rangers news, pick up the NY Post today. Not only is their the usual 2 articles - Slapshots and a write-up of whatever Rangers game happened Saturday night, but there is an interview with Tom Renney (gasp), and Hank Lundqvist featured on Page Six Magazine.
-I recommend you do not eat anything while reading the Renney interview. It reads much like his post-game interviews. I find it interesting he talks so extensively of 9-11 and how much it meant to him, and continues to mean to him. Perhaps that makes me less surprised he picked a Canadian-molded American for his team captain. Of course his international career in ice hockey make me wonder how happy he is to have 3 Swedes on the team. You'd think the team colors alone would be enough to set him off.
**Random side note, on Renny, btw. I missed this quote from him after Monday's game against the Isles about one Petr Prucha. Courtesy of Ranger Rants and Andrew Gross: http://njmg.typepad.com/rangersblog/2008/12/watch-out.html
"Renney said he expects Petr Prucha to remain in the lineup, at least for the next few games. Renney said he is looking for some "sustainability" out of Prucha's game, meaning he needs to see exactly what he got last night. Prucha has gone in and (mostly) out of the line because he hasn't shown sustainability in his game.
Prucha said he does not and has not wanted to be traded despite his lack of playing time and, for the most part, does not think or worry about the fact that he does not have a contract with the Rangers past this season.
"Not unless you remind me," Prucha said, when I asked him about it.
To which I say, sustainability my @ss!**
-As for the Hank article in Page Six, it's a good read. He is a unique player. A unique person. And as unassuming a superstar as this team may ever see. It's both intriguing and refreshing.
I just hope they don't ruin him!!
-Lastly, Larry Brooks' article on the game speaks about how the Rangers "specialty teams" are anything but "special." They might just cost this team a playoff berth in the end.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/01042009/sports/rangers/special_team_woes_plague_blueshirts_147161.htm
My personal favorite though:
"The shame of it is that the Rangers and the coaching staff seem unable to reverse the season-long follies on the PP. PP? Hey, maybe that's a signal head coach Tom Renney should recognize - PP, as in Petr PruchaPetr Prucha , who scored for the second straight game and is the team's most potent, if unused and thus dormant, weapon with the man advantage.
Of course, it only took half a season for Renney to recognize what Prucha has to offer at even-strength, so it's probably unwise to expect too much. "
So true, Larry. So true.
And what a shame that, of course, Prucha and Valiquette's really solid all around efforts will be lost in yet one more game where their flailing PP lost them a game. And not like they had anything really to do about it. Ideally, a goalie should not be so tested on his team's own PP. And ideally the only guy on this team that has recently scored 16 PP goals in a year, should really be on it.
Sense? Nah, we don't play with sense in Rangerland.
Sad News:
-It's been commented upon, and granted I was a little late to pick up on it, but the news is no less sad today. A tragedy really.
http://tsn.ca/canadian_hockey/story/?id=261626&lid=headline&lpos=topStory_canadian_hockey
If all players, everywhere, have to tighten helmets so this does not happen, so be it. A small price to pay.
Rest in Peace, Don Sanderson. You never like to hear of things like this happening, and hopefully we never will again.
Saturday, January 3, 2009
The Great AO, Halfway to a Record, and The Funniest Fight I May Have Ever Seen. . .
Well - that game had almost everything.
Almost.
I must say though, I was highly entertained. Annoyed at points, but highly entertained.
The Most Entertaining Moments:
Marc Staal is the man. While I have never been a fan of knock-em down defenseman, Staal has found a way to do it in a way I enjoy. Perhaps because it appears effortless. While he's a tall guy, he's not overly big (196 lbs?) but he hits like he is. And his battles with Ovechkin make me wish these teams played more than four times. Great stuff.
AO. I've been saying it and it's nice to hear the even-if-we-are-getting-more-and-more-nauseating-with-every-game tandem of Joe and Sam say so. He is amazing. That character and that ability. Forget it. There really aren't words for how exciting he can be. A rare thing. I'm envious of Capitals fans getting to see that night in and night out. No wonder they pack the building. The team is great - (with only one loss and one overtime loss at home all year and their best start in 40 years!) but that is the man they are coming to see. No question.
Wade Redden actually stepping up and, well stepping up period. I almost thought I'd fallen asleep and woken up in dreamland. That's the most energy I've seen from him yet. I hope that won't be the last. Show you have a pulse, Wade, damn it. They are paying you enough! Too bad none of that seemed to help their defense.
Petr Prucha getting another chance and another goal. Hmmm. Wonders do never cease to amaze me. It wasn't even Dubinsky and Zherdev, in my opinion, that were having great games. Prucha was just skating with a power all his own, a man possessed. It was great to see and it paid off for him. Now, he scored. Again. He was one of the best players. Again. What else can you ask for from the kid?
Fight of the Year:
No, no, not Orr/Cote, not Orr/Boulton, but Staal and Semin. I have not laughed that hard in a long, long time. And it's just laughter. I mean Semin will never live that down, but he's a great enough player people will probably forgive him for it. But what was going through his head?? haha. I love Staal just ripping the jersey off with no effort. And what can Semin do but slap him like a child who had a toy taken away. I love Semin. I do. But that was the funniest fight I think I have ever seen. Ever.
The Not-So-Entertaining:
Gomez, while speedy, had another one of those games were the speed appears to generate nothing, in the end.
Was it me, or did Drury spend a lot of this game on his butt? It seemed so.
And yet, those are the guys that are out there with the game on the line. The same stagnant group of players that have made the Rangers powerplay. . . a disgrace.
Why not next time the game is on the line, stick Staal back along the line by the defensive zone to block the empty net. Stick Callahan and Dubinsky and Mara in the offensive zone to hit and tie up every other player, much like the PK that seems to work so well. Put Z out there to put the puck on net. And stick Prucha in front of the net.
Tell me even my lay-man's idea doesn't make more sense than what Renney did?
More Than Halfway to a Record:I'd really love to hear the post-game comments on this one. If it hadn't happened 11 times already this year, you might be able to say, bad bounce, and it's Alex freakin' Ovechkin. But, guess what, it's not the first time. And credit AO all you want - you know I will! But the Rangers powerplay is so bad. It's so bad, there are no words. It's so bad they should have been denying it for years now. In fact, it's so bad, they should literally skate the puck back to their OWN zone on the PP, give the puck intentionally to the other team, and play it like a penalty kill.
Because any other way, they are just asking to be scored upon.
12 goals with just over half a season to go. They can hit 22 easy to tie and make 23 goals to set the all-time record for shorties allowed. I am confident they can.
And yet, do they really seem to care? After THREE years of a bad powerplay? And this third year where it has somehow, beyond anyone's comprehension, gotten WORSE?
That's It and That's All:
Really, despite a few decisions I'd correct - like pp personnel and the coaching staff in general - I thought the game was entertaining. I really did. Credit guys like Staal, Prucha, Callahan, Dawes, and even Redden for that tonight. (For the record, even though Joe/Sam overdo it a lot, Dawes has looked remarkably better in the last five. No doubt). And big props to Valliquette. He played very well on the fly and was not in any way the reason this team could not pull out a win.
And AO is AO, so that's entertainment right there.
I just wonder what happens next?
Does this team's big name, big priced players actually, well, learn to play?
When do they stop referring to whatever line Gomez is on as the #1/Top Line?
When do they take my ideas for the PP or give up entirely?
And lastly, if Prucha scores a goal - the only Rangers goal -, and they still lose, does he play again?
Tough ones, folks. Tough ones.
I'm upstairs to watch some World Juniors before the late evening Oilers/Stars tilt. Should be good. Enjoy all.
Almost.
I must say though, I was highly entertained. Annoyed at points, but highly entertained.
The Most Entertaining Moments:
Marc Staal is the man. While I have never been a fan of knock-em down defenseman, Staal has found a way to do it in a way I enjoy. Perhaps because it appears effortless. While he's a tall guy, he's not overly big (196 lbs?) but he hits like he is. And his battles with Ovechkin make me wish these teams played more than four times. Great stuff.
AO. I've been saying it and it's nice to hear the even-if-we-are-getting-more-and-more-nauseating-with-every-game tandem of Joe and Sam say so. He is amazing. That character and that ability. Forget it. There really aren't words for how exciting he can be. A rare thing. I'm envious of Capitals fans getting to see that night in and night out. No wonder they pack the building. The team is great - (with only one loss and one overtime loss at home all year and their best start in 40 years!) but that is the man they are coming to see. No question.
Wade Redden actually stepping up and, well stepping up period. I almost thought I'd fallen asleep and woken up in dreamland. That's the most energy I've seen from him yet. I hope that won't be the last. Show you have a pulse, Wade, damn it. They are paying you enough! Too bad none of that seemed to help their defense.
Petr Prucha getting another chance and another goal. Hmmm. Wonders do never cease to amaze me. It wasn't even Dubinsky and Zherdev, in my opinion, that were having great games. Prucha was just skating with a power all his own, a man possessed. It was great to see and it paid off for him. Now, he scored. Again. He was one of the best players. Again. What else can you ask for from the kid?
Fight of the Year:
No, no, not Orr/Cote, not Orr/Boulton, but Staal and Semin. I have not laughed that hard in a long, long time. And it's just laughter. I mean Semin will never live that down, but he's a great enough player people will probably forgive him for it. But what was going through his head?? haha. I love Staal just ripping the jersey off with no effort. And what can Semin do but slap him like a child who had a toy taken away. I love Semin. I do. But that was the funniest fight I think I have ever seen. Ever.
The Not-So-Entertaining:
Gomez, while speedy, had another one of those games were the speed appears to generate nothing, in the end.
Was it me, or did Drury spend a lot of this game on his butt? It seemed so.
And yet, those are the guys that are out there with the game on the line. The same stagnant group of players that have made the Rangers powerplay. . . a disgrace.
Why not next time the game is on the line, stick Staal back along the line by the defensive zone to block the empty net. Stick Callahan and Dubinsky and Mara in the offensive zone to hit and tie up every other player, much like the PK that seems to work so well. Put Z out there to put the puck on net. And stick Prucha in front of the net.
Tell me even my lay-man's idea doesn't make more sense than what Renney did?
More Than Halfway to a Record:I'd really love to hear the post-game comments on this one. If it hadn't happened 11 times already this year, you might be able to say, bad bounce, and it's Alex freakin' Ovechkin. But, guess what, it's not the first time. And credit AO all you want - you know I will! But the Rangers powerplay is so bad. It's so bad, there are no words. It's so bad they should have been denying it for years now. In fact, it's so bad, they should literally skate the puck back to their OWN zone on the PP, give the puck intentionally to the other team, and play it like a penalty kill.
Because any other way, they are just asking to be scored upon.
12 goals with just over half a season to go. They can hit 22 easy to tie and make 23 goals to set the all-time record for shorties allowed. I am confident they can.
And yet, do they really seem to care? After THREE years of a bad powerplay? And this third year where it has somehow, beyond anyone's comprehension, gotten WORSE?
That's It and That's All:
Really, despite a few decisions I'd correct - like pp personnel and the coaching staff in general - I thought the game was entertaining. I really did. Credit guys like Staal, Prucha, Callahan, Dawes, and even Redden for that tonight. (For the record, even though Joe/Sam overdo it a lot, Dawes has looked remarkably better in the last five. No doubt). And big props to Valliquette. He played very well on the fly and was not in any way the reason this team could not pull out a win.
And AO is AO, so that's entertainment right there.
I just wonder what happens next?
Does this team's big name, big priced players actually, well, learn to play?
When do they stop referring to whatever line Gomez is on as the #1/Top Line?
When do they take my ideas for the PP or give up entirely?
And lastly, if Prucha scores a goal - the only Rangers goal -, and they still lose, does he play again?
Tough ones, folks. Tough ones.
I'm upstairs to watch some World Juniors before the late evening Oilers/Stars tilt. Should be good. Enjoy all.
The Halfway Rangers Wrapup (Part Two). . .
And to continue. . .
The Started Fast and Slowed Down (Continued):
#20 - Fredrick Sjostrom. I'm calling Freddy's start "fast" because for the most part, it kinda was. He had a big start in shootouts, which is a skill that should be credited. His early games and his type of goal scoring as shown in game 4 versus Philly (even if at the time I called it an empty net anyone could have hit; little did I know just how hard this team would make it to score) made him earn more than fourth line minutes. Problem was, once he got there, nothing much happened with it. Whether that is him slowing down, or who he is playing with, or what, I am not sure. But he's not been fast and has not been as effective for a while now. A great PKer, yes, but as you can see, the Rangers have plenty of those. I still think with the right people Sjo can score more, but again, considering no one on this team can seem to score consistently, I am not sure what to say about it.
#17 - Brandon Dubinsky. I love this guy. I expected him to have a breakout season and the way he looked in camp, I really thought that was the case. His time in Europe and his early season heroics seem a lifetime ago away now. Why? Perhaps Renney's line switching. Perhaps Renney's benching. Perhaps Dubinsky just wants to play with Euro-style players and Renney keeps screaming at him that he's a Ameri-Canadian and he should play like it. I'm not sure. But Dubi has heart and when he's on, he's on. He'll take one for the team. He has the right attitude. I just expected more and it hurts to see him struggle. He can be one of the few, precious few, captivating players to watch on this team. I hope, sincerely hope, he can get the right linemates and stay with them, and that he has a monster second half. He's struggled and maybe it is a sophomore slump. But maybe he's just needing a chance to get back to the top.
The Youth and Heart Mis-Used:
#29 - Lauri Korpikoski. The Youth. I might be the only one or in the grave minority, but I am not sure if I like the progress Lauri has been making on the current Rangers team. I saw a kid in pre-season play amazingly. Go to Europe and play amazingly. Come back to the states and look flat. They sent him down, which was in my opinion the right move. He flourished playing wing down there. They bring him back up and make him go right back to centering half the moronic players on this team. I don't get it. And I don't think it's him. I've seen him look better as of late, and yes, add him to the list of guys who is getting PK time now. But really after Europe, I've only seen him look really comfortable a handful of times. Is that growing pains? Sure could be. I just wonder why other young guys on other teams seem to fit in more seemlessly. I'm not suggesting he should fit in perfectly. I just hate to voice my fear which is that he is being used incorrectly and that it will stunt the type of player I think he can be. Again, bright spots in Rangers organization. There are too few; they can't afford to screw more up.
#25 - Petr Prucha. The heart. I'm putting Pete under this title because he, quite honestly (to borrow his good old coach's favorite phrase) has been drastically and unjustifyably misused for so long now. For this season, there is not a bunch to go on, as he's only played in 12 of the team 39 games, with only seconds of powerplay time, and an ever changing group of linemates. I've devoted much time (and time I was glad to and will continue to be glad to spend) on talking about his situation. So I'll leave it at this. Considering his limited ice time, limited playing time, he has made the most he could possibly out of his situation. In only his 12 games, he is tied for fourth on the team in shooting percentage. And one of the few even players they have in terms of +/-. He did all he can do. And more really. His teammates love and support him. He has energy and heart that I'm envious of. And defensive liability? As a person who just re-watched the Prague games, I can say that Pete was on the ice BOTH games with his linemates of Korpikoski and Callahan towards the one minute mark of BOTH games with a ONE goal lead, becuase their INTENSE forechecking was known to keep them in the TAMPA zone. Obviously Renney and Co. forgets who they depended upon to get the job done on the INTERNATIONAL stage with the WHOLE country watching. Prucha may never be the BEST player on this team talent wise, but he sure plays like he is. And I'll take that every time.
The Middle of the Road:
#10 - Nigel Dawes. I am going to be brief in an attempt to not sound anything other than straightforward here. Nigel had an invisible beginning to the season. Invisible. He got knocked off the puck, looked overweight and out of place. It was hard to see. A kid who scored a franchise record number of goals for Kootenay, I was excited to see that translate to the NHL. And while he had moments last year, this year was a very big disappointment. But it was for so many that to single Dawes out would be unfair. Instead, I'm going to say that despite the slow start (and in addition to the two game stint he played with Fritsche and Korpikoski earlier this year), he has really started to find his stride. The last 4? 5? games he's looked much improved. And that's great. The Rangers need all they can get. I mean you have to stick with your struggling playmakers, don't you Tom? (Sorry, Nigel, I tried really hard but just couldn't resist).
The Started Bad and Got, Well, Better than Bad. . .
#3 - Michal Rozsival. Now, yes, Rozi's -10 is nothing to brag about. And I thought he was permanently going to be the Rangers fans new whipping boy this year (and for however many of the next three years he stayed here) - joining Nedved, Poti, and Malik. He had a dreadful start. Dreadful. Looked helpless and the booing- let me just say, while perhaps deserved although I don't really personally believe in it, did not help him. It actually made him suck worse. Thankfully, a surprisingly good game in Tampa pre-Thanksgiving, and a well timed Western road swing, made Rozsival look more like a player. A player worth $5 a year? Please. That contract is a joke. He is not worth it. He's our 4th best defenseman on his good days. But have I seen a noteable improvement in him? Yes. Will it last. Gosh I hope so.
The Funny and the Not-So-Funny Over-Priced Centers:
#19 - Scott Gomez. I do not even know how to begin here. The guy is funny. His sense of humor is great. But his sense of humor does nothing to make me laugh and forget that he is in NO WAY our best player. And yet, to the league's utter amazement I'm sure, he is being paid $10 million dollars this year. $10. I thought, I honestly thought, that maybe, maybe, with Jagr and Co. gone and Gomez being able to "do his thing" that he'd be setting up people. That he'd get 20 goals himself and set up teammates for around 50-60 goals. Give or take. I want to smack myself. For whatever reason, it still isn't clicking. Is it him? Is it the pressure? I don't know. I don't. But I know that he's like that song "Hot and Cold." He's out of the lineup, the Rangers flounder. He comes back, things seem to right. He either skates the fastest and looks the sharpest or he skates the slowest and looks the most confused. He either wins an unimaginable # of faceoffs, or he gets blown out in the category. I am not sure what the Rangers expected. But I expected some consistency. And while he's funny and he has his moments, there is no way I can view him as anything but over-priced and over-hyped. I hope. I hope he can figure out who he can play with and get it done. But the fact that any of us (and perhaps me included) thought that Naslund/Drury/Gomez was a good idea in the first place, was seriously disillusioned. Right now, he sits fourth on the team with scoring, setting up at a faster pace than he's scoring, which makes sense. But he and his "boys" are a combined -27 right now (Naslund -10, Drury -7). Something is not right here. And he's funny but he's just not THAT funny.
#23 - Chris Drury. I am trying to breath and I write this. Sather chose to go out and sign both Drury and his other moronic bobsy twin (see above) to these outrageous contracts that if not already, promise to cripple this franchise into the new decade. I can't be mad at him for it. But I can sure as hell take it out on him when he plays like crap. Drury does one thing exceptionally well. He's a good PKer. That's great. The Rangers have Betts, Sjostrom, Korpikoski, Gomez, Callahan, and any other random player that can do just as good a job as him. He is a marginal faceoff man. Betts has not been perfect this year. No one has on faceoffs. Last year this team rocked at faceoffs and you know what - it didn't help them at all. But...if that is supposed to be your only redeeming quality and you can't get it done, you are an embarassment. Worse. Worse than all of that and his stupid contract is the fact that he is captain. If I allowed myself, I'd keep myself up at night thinking about what a disgrace it is that this man is captain of my team. He has no heart. If he does, I would love to see it. But as it stands, he has no heart. He has no passion. And he is, arguably, the most boring human being alive. I feel sorry for him actually. I stupidly wanted him here and not Gomez, if you can believe it. A captain should motivate. A captain should have a pulse. A captain should be a leader. If he is motivating, he's doing a $$itty job. If he has a pulse, he's shown it three times, twice when he nearly decapitated people swinging his stick in anger. If he's a leader, he is leading this team right down the road into lackluster oblivion. Messier was a messiah. You could read the pain of a loss on Jagr's face from across the ice. Leetch, while neither verbal nor a great captain, was harder on himself than anyone and he was arguably one of the BEST defenseman EVER to play the game. What's Drury got to say for himself. Oh right he had a good Christmas. Embarassing. Utterly embarassing.
The Defensemen Who Can't Play Defense:
#45 - Dmitri Kalinin. Since Kalinin made no promises and since he was not the stupid man with the cigar that gave him his contract, what can I really say about him. I've never heard him speak. He has no emotion. He has no ...anything really. He is just a defenseman who cannot play defense. A defenseman who was probably hidden for years by a stellar system in Buffalo. A defenseman I am sure many of us will forget when he is gone. But someone that adds nothing to the team. And someone who is just really, really bad at what he's supposed to do. I feel he's a good guy which is why I refuse to lay into him more than that. But who would know. The guy is perfect for Renney's team mold. Do the job (crappy) and keep your mouth shut.
The Horrifically Overpriced Defenseman Who Can't Play Defense:
#6 - Wade Redden. Finally and at last we come to what arguably might just be the WORST free-agent signing the Rangers have ever made. Worst because it is in the post-cap era where the Rangers can't just blink and say, oh well, who's next. Worst because they had to have known better than to give a guy that was barely hanging onto the title of defenseman, let alone former All-Star defenseman, in the sinking ship that was Ottawa, a contract like this. Worst that they thought, with any degree of certainty that New York, of all cities, was the place for him to fix his life and his career. $6.5 million. For 6 years. My heart dropped. My stomach lurched. And I said, wow, I hope I am wrong. I hope I am wrong and this guy can get better, can play here. Can be worth even half of his salary. But he isn't. He's a defensive liability just like Kalinin at $4 million more per year. His famous breakout pass that was lauded for ever and to ad-naseum, I have seen it maybe twice. Twice. This was the key to our powerplay woes? Our $6.5 million dollar cure to our powerplay woes? I cannot even speak because my stomach is starting in again. Seriously? Seriously!!! Wade Redden, the hands and feet of stone defenseman, with the IMMOVABLE contract, will be here in NY longer than anyone. Tell me how Sather sleeps at night over this one. And now tell me he even cares.
The I Wish You All Were Somewhere Else So You Could Be Saved From This:
#49 - Dan Fritsche. Dan Fristche is not the best player, but he's too good to not be playing here. With the list I just read above and the face he can't crack this lineup because of favoritism and other bs, he probably wishes he was still in Columbus. I'm pulling for you Dan. I seriously am.
#38 - Corey Potter. Corey Potter is yet another bright spot in the future of the Rangers organization that will probably never really come to see the light of day. He plays two games where he does NOTHING wrong and looks better than 75% of the rest of his fellow defensemen. He then takes a scenic tour of the Westcoast arenas, in street clothes, and proceeds to get shuffled from Hartford and back at whim. He's better. Everyone knows it. I hope they don't ruin him too.
#12 - Patrick Rissmiller. Happy New Year, Pat. I hope you are enjoying Hartford. And I hope your New Year's wish was that Sather burns off his damn moustache with his cigar. Because I
really wouldn't blame you. Come on people. He can play for the San Jose Sharks (the NHL elite) but he can't play here because we need to have room for the boredom and monotony and the salaries.
Alright, it was long and it was wordy, but there you have it. I'd summarize the overall good and bad and go into the coaches, but who really cares. The Rangers are where they are because of the tidy mix of the men above, the moronic coaching staff, and the been-here-way-too-long management. A handful of the guys that play, play like they mean it and deserve to be out there on a nightly basis. The salaries handed out in 2007 and 2008 will handicap this team for years to come. They are 25th in the league in scoring beating out Minnesota, Florida, Nashville, Tampa Bay and Ottawa. Their powerplay has been a joke for 3 straight years now. The only things they can brag to are a great penalty kill, which has faded, a Vezina caliber goalie, who will fade if he is continued to be ridden as he is, and a blue-chip future All-Star defenseman which is probably wondering how he ended up here in the first place.
If they all love each other so much. If these are all the best group of guys they've all ever played with. Great. Seriously great. But they are barely winning by it. And in the process and in between embarassing losses that make other team's all time history reels, they are being led to play the most boring, lifeless brand of hockey I have seen in a long time.
So Happy New Year everyone! Ignore whatever above is too sarcastic. Enjoy what you can. And remember, hockey may be life, but there is more to life than hockey.
Yeah right... :)
The Started Fast and Slowed Down (Continued):
#20 - Fredrick Sjostrom. I'm calling Freddy's start "fast" because for the most part, it kinda was. He had a big start in shootouts, which is a skill that should be credited. His early games and his type of goal scoring as shown in game 4 versus Philly (even if at the time I called it an empty net anyone could have hit; little did I know just how hard this team would make it to score) made him earn more than fourth line minutes. Problem was, once he got there, nothing much happened with it. Whether that is him slowing down, or who he is playing with, or what, I am not sure. But he's not been fast and has not been as effective for a while now. A great PKer, yes, but as you can see, the Rangers have plenty of those. I still think with the right people Sjo can score more, but again, considering no one on this team can seem to score consistently, I am not sure what to say about it.
#17 - Brandon Dubinsky. I love this guy. I expected him to have a breakout season and the way he looked in camp, I really thought that was the case. His time in Europe and his early season heroics seem a lifetime ago away now. Why? Perhaps Renney's line switching. Perhaps Renney's benching. Perhaps Dubinsky just wants to play with Euro-style players and Renney keeps screaming at him that he's a Ameri-Canadian and he should play like it. I'm not sure. But Dubi has heart and when he's on, he's on. He'll take one for the team. He has the right attitude. I just expected more and it hurts to see him struggle. He can be one of the few, precious few, captivating players to watch on this team. I hope, sincerely hope, he can get the right linemates and stay with them, and that he has a monster second half. He's struggled and maybe it is a sophomore slump. But maybe he's just needing a chance to get back to the top.
The Youth and Heart Mis-Used:
#29 - Lauri Korpikoski. The Youth. I might be the only one or in the grave minority, but I am not sure if I like the progress Lauri has been making on the current Rangers team. I saw a kid in pre-season play amazingly. Go to Europe and play amazingly. Come back to the states and look flat. They sent him down, which was in my opinion the right move. He flourished playing wing down there. They bring him back up and make him go right back to centering half the moronic players on this team. I don't get it. And I don't think it's him. I've seen him look better as of late, and yes, add him to the list of guys who is getting PK time now. But really after Europe, I've only seen him look really comfortable a handful of times. Is that growing pains? Sure could be. I just wonder why other young guys on other teams seem to fit in more seemlessly. I'm not suggesting he should fit in perfectly. I just hate to voice my fear which is that he is being used incorrectly and that it will stunt the type of player I think he can be. Again, bright spots in Rangers organization. There are too few; they can't afford to screw more up.
#25 - Petr Prucha. The heart. I'm putting Pete under this title because he, quite honestly (to borrow his good old coach's favorite phrase) has been drastically and unjustifyably misused for so long now. For this season, there is not a bunch to go on, as he's only played in 12 of the team 39 games, with only seconds of powerplay time, and an ever changing group of linemates. I've devoted much time (and time I was glad to and will continue to be glad to spend) on talking about his situation. So I'll leave it at this. Considering his limited ice time, limited playing time, he has made the most he could possibly out of his situation. In only his 12 games, he is tied for fourth on the team in shooting percentage. And one of the few even players they have in terms of +/-. He did all he can do. And more really. His teammates love and support him. He has energy and heart that I'm envious of. And defensive liability? As a person who just re-watched the Prague games, I can say that Pete was on the ice BOTH games with his linemates of Korpikoski and Callahan towards the one minute mark of BOTH games with a ONE goal lead, becuase their INTENSE forechecking was known to keep them in the TAMPA zone. Obviously Renney and Co. forgets who they depended upon to get the job done on the INTERNATIONAL stage with the WHOLE country watching. Prucha may never be the BEST player on this team talent wise, but he sure plays like he is. And I'll take that every time.
The Middle of the Road:
#10 - Nigel Dawes. I am going to be brief in an attempt to not sound anything other than straightforward here. Nigel had an invisible beginning to the season. Invisible. He got knocked off the puck, looked overweight and out of place. It was hard to see. A kid who scored a franchise record number of goals for Kootenay, I was excited to see that translate to the NHL. And while he had moments last year, this year was a very big disappointment. But it was for so many that to single Dawes out would be unfair. Instead, I'm going to say that despite the slow start (and in addition to the two game stint he played with Fritsche and Korpikoski earlier this year), he has really started to find his stride. The last 4? 5? games he's looked much improved. And that's great. The Rangers need all they can get. I mean you have to stick with your struggling playmakers, don't you Tom? (Sorry, Nigel, I tried really hard but just couldn't resist).
The Started Bad and Got, Well, Better than Bad. . .
#3 - Michal Rozsival. Now, yes, Rozi's -10 is nothing to brag about. And I thought he was permanently going to be the Rangers fans new whipping boy this year (and for however many of the next three years he stayed here) - joining Nedved, Poti, and Malik. He had a dreadful start. Dreadful. Looked helpless and the booing- let me just say, while perhaps deserved although I don't really personally believe in it, did not help him. It actually made him suck worse. Thankfully, a surprisingly good game in Tampa pre-Thanksgiving, and a well timed Western road swing, made Rozsival look more like a player. A player worth $5 a year? Please. That contract is a joke. He is not worth it. He's our 4th best defenseman on his good days. But have I seen a noteable improvement in him? Yes. Will it last. Gosh I hope so.
The Funny and the Not-So-Funny Over-Priced Centers:
#19 - Scott Gomez. I do not even know how to begin here. The guy is funny. His sense of humor is great. But his sense of humor does nothing to make me laugh and forget that he is in NO WAY our best player. And yet, to the league's utter amazement I'm sure, he is being paid $10 million dollars this year. $10. I thought, I honestly thought, that maybe, maybe, with Jagr and Co. gone and Gomez being able to "do his thing" that he'd be setting up people. That he'd get 20 goals himself and set up teammates for around 50-60 goals. Give or take. I want to smack myself. For whatever reason, it still isn't clicking. Is it him? Is it the pressure? I don't know. I don't. But I know that he's like that song "Hot and Cold." He's out of the lineup, the Rangers flounder. He comes back, things seem to right. He either skates the fastest and looks the sharpest or he skates the slowest and looks the most confused. He either wins an unimaginable # of faceoffs, or he gets blown out in the category. I am not sure what the Rangers expected. But I expected some consistency. And while he's funny and he has his moments, there is no way I can view him as anything but over-priced and over-hyped. I hope. I hope he can figure out who he can play with and get it done. But the fact that any of us (and perhaps me included) thought that Naslund/Drury/Gomez was a good idea in the first place, was seriously disillusioned. Right now, he sits fourth on the team with scoring, setting up at a faster pace than he's scoring, which makes sense. But he and his "boys" are a combined -27 right now (Naslund -10, Drury -7). Something is not right here. And he's funny but he's just not THAT funny.
#23 - Chris Drury. I am trying to breath and I write this. Sather chose to go out and sign both Drury and his other moronic bobsy twin (see above) to these outrageous contracts that if not already, promise to cripple this franchise into the new decade. I can't be mad at him for it. But I can sure as hell take it out on him when he plays like crap. Drury does one thing exceptionally well. He's a good PKer. That's great. The Rangers have Betts, Sjostrom, Korpikoski, Gomez, Callahan, and any other random player that can do just as good a job as him. He is a marginal faceoff man. Betts has not been perfect this year. No one has on faceoffs. Last year this team rocked at faceoffs and you know what - it didn't help them at all. But...if that is supposed to be your only redeeming quality and you can't get it done, you are an embarassment. Worse. Worse than all of that and his stupid contract is the fact that he is captain. If I allowed myself, I'd keep myself up at night thinking about what a disgrace it is that this man is captain of my team. He has no heart. If he does, I would love to see it. But as it stands, he has no heart. He has no passion. And he is, arguably, the most boring human being alive. I feel sorry for him actually. I stupidly wanted him here and not Gomez, if you can believe it. A captain should motivate. A captain should have a pulse. A captain should be a leader. If he is motivating, he's doing a $$itty job. If he has a pulse, he's shown it three times, twice when he nearly decapitated people swinging his stick in anger. If he's a leader, he is leading this team right down the road into lackluster oblivion. Messier was a messiah. You could read the pain of a loss on Jagr's face from across the ice. Leetch, while neither verbal nor a great captain, was harder on himself than anyone and he was arguably one of the BEST defenseman EVER to play the game. What's Drury got to say for himself. Oh right he had a good Christmas. Embarassing. Utterly embarassing.
The Defensemen Who Can't Play Defense:
#45 - Dmitri Kalinin. Since Kalinin made no promises and since he was not the stupid man with the cigar that gave him his contract, what can I really say about him. I've never heard him speak. He has no emotion. He has no ...anything really. He is just a defenseman who cannot play defense. A defenseman who was probably hidden for years by a stellar system in Buffalo. A defenseman I am sure many of us will forget when he is gone. But someone that adds nothing to the team. And someone who is just really, really bad at what he's supposed to do. I feel he's a good guy which is why I refuse to lay into him more than that. But who would know. The guy is perfect for Renney's team mold. Do the job (crappy) and keep your mouth shut.
The Horrifically Overpriced Defenseman Who Can't Play Defense:
#6 - Wade Redden. Finally and at last we come to what arguably might just be the WORST free-agent signing the Rangers have ever made. Worst because it is in the post-cap era where the Rangers can't just blink and say, oh well, who's next. Worst because they had to have known better than to give a guy that was barely hanging onto the title of defenseman, let alone former All-Star defenseman, in the sinking ship that was Ottawa, a contract like this. Worst that they thought, with any degree of certainty that New York, of all cities, was the place for him to fix his life and his career. $6.5 million. For 6 years. My heart dropped. My stomach lurched. And I said, wow, I hope I am wrong. I hope I am wrong and this guy can get better, can play here. Can be worth even half of his salary. But he isn't. He's a defensive liability just like Kalinin at $4 million more per year. His famous breakout pass that was lauded for ever and to ad-naseum, I have seen it maybe twice. Twice. This was the key to our powerplay woes? Our $6.5 million dollar cure to our powerplay woes? I cannot even speak because my stomach is starting in again. Seriously? Seriously!!! Wade Redden, the hands and feet of stone defenseman, with the IMMOVABLE contract, will be here in NY longer than anyone. Tell me how Sather sleeps at night over this one. And now tell me he even cares.
The I Wish You All Were Somewhere Else So You Could Be Saved From This:
#49 - Dan Fritsche. Dan Fristche is not the best player, but he's too good to not be playing here. With the list I just read above and the face he can't crack this lineup because of favoritism and other bs, he probably wishes he was still in Columbus. I'm pulling for you Dan. I seriously am.
#38 - Corey Potter. Corey Potter is yet another bright spot in the future of the Rangers organization that will probably never really come to see the light of day. He plays two games where he does NOTHING wrong and looks better than 75% of the rest of his fellow defensemen. He then takes a scenic tour of the Westcoast arenas, in street clothes, and proceeds to get shuffled from Hartford and back at whim. He's better. Everyone knows it. I hope they don't ruin him too.
#12 - Patrick Rissmiller. Happy New Year, Pat. I hope you are enjoying Hartford. And I hope your New Year's wish was that Sather burns off his damn moustache with his cigar. Because I
really wouldn't blame you. Come on people. He can play for the San Jose Sharks (the NHL elite) but he can't play here because we need to have room for the boredom and monotony and the salaries.
Alright, it was long and it was wordy, but there you have it. I'd summarize the overall good and bad and go into the coaches, but who really cares. The Rangers are where they are because of the tidy mix of the men above, the moronic coaching staff, and the been-here-way-too-long management. A handful of the guys that play, play like they mean it and deserve to be out there on a nightly basis. The salaries handed out in 2007 and 2008 will handicap this team for years to come. They are 25th in the league in scoring beating out Minnesota, Florida, Nashville, Tampa Bay and Ottawa. Their powerplay has been a joke for 3 straight years now. The only things they can brag to are a great penalty kill, which has faded, a Vezina caliber goalie, who will fade if he is continued to be ridden as he is, and a blue-chip future All-Star defenseman which is probably wondering how he ended up here in the first place.
If they all love each other so much. If these are all the best group of guys they've all ever played with. Great. Seriously great. But they are barely winning by it. And in the process and in between embarassing losses that make other team's all time history reels, they are being led to play the most boring, lifeless brand of hockey I have seen in a long time.
So Happy New Year everyone! Ignore whatever above is too sarcastic. Enjoy what you can. And remember, hockey may be life, but there is more to life than hockey.
Yeah right... :)
Friday, January 2, 2009
The Half Way Rangers Wrapup (Part One). . .
I am a few days late with it, but I was traveling this past week, so I guess that can be excused. I hope.
But before too much time passes, I wanted to kinda give a rundown/summary of the players on the Rangers and how their 1st "half" of the season has been going in my opinion. You will not ever see me doing grades for something like this, because grades are so, well how do you really quantify them. So I won't try. Instead you get rambling mess. With that, here we go.
The Great:
#30 - Henrik Lundqvist. If not for Hank, and his play in October and November, this team would not be over .500. This team would be, honestly, they'd probably be near the bottom of the conference in my opinion. For a while they could not score more than 2 goals. Hank, while not even having his "BEST" year perhaps, has done all he can do and more to keep them in the race, and keep them in that race with actually a stellar record. Stellar in comparison to their form of play that is. All due credit to Hank. And if the Rangers defense hadn't played so horrifically and had helped him to a shutout or two (he's still at zero for the year, folks), I'd think after 3 years of consequtive nominations, he'd be in good shape for the Vezina. (Although Tim Thomas and the ever-stellar Evgeni Nabakovmight have something to say about that).
#18 - Marc Staal. If there is a bright light on the Rangers defense and a bright light for the future of the Rangers organization, it is this guy. Poised beyond his years, Staal is one of the few players on the Rangers to not only not make mistakes, but to actually seem to grow and improve at a rapid pace. He's young, all of 21-years-old, and he plays like he's been doing it for 10 years. He's also one of the few guys to keep his promises from before the season. He said he had made a committment to getting stronger and to hitting and finishing his checks. That guy has done nothing but remain committed to that. That commitment shows AND it's been effective. I admire that so much. If I had to pick a favorite player, he'd be it. He is not Brian Leetch. He will not be Brian Leetch. He's not in that mold. But if he could and would add a little offense, he'd be more than Rangers fans can ask for. And honestly, he already is. A pleasure to watch.
The Good:
#40 - Steve Valiquette. Steve Valiquette is one of the few players I truly admire on this Rangers squad right now. A funny guy with a great mind and an eloquent way of speaking, he's entertaining in all degrees. He also happens to be a genuinely great backup. And I still, along with others, agree he could start in this league. The Rangers tend not to use him so much, but I am thrilled they have used him more so far this year. He is rarely the reason they lose. I mean, sure, people can look at that Toronto melt-down and say, he could have had some of those five goals in under six minutes. But I really feel sometimes there are just collapses - team wide - and you cannot stop the bleeding. He's not perfect, but you know what. He's damn good.
#27 - Paul Mara. Great team guy. This guy took less money to play for NY. He wanted to be a Ranger. And he plays like he knows what that truly means. I only wish more of his teammates would understand and emulate that behavior. A guy who is not a defensive liability. A guy who will stick up - words and gloves - and do the job, as needed. Just a really big bargain. Also happens to be very funny, which on a team of cookie-cutter bores, helps a great deal, let me tell you. I'd take 2 more Paul Mara's. I really would.
#24 - Ryan Callahan. If I'd take 2 more Paul Mara's, I'd take 4 more Ryan Callahans. With a scoring touch. That's Callahan's only problem - one the whole team suffers from right now it seems - and that's that he can't seem to score as much as he should or even deserves to. I'll check after a game and see how many hits Callahan has and be amazed. There is rarely a game he doesn't skate at 100%, hitting everything, forechecking, and being quick on the puck. A great attitude. And someone you wouldn't mind paying because you know you are getting your money's worth. Sure, more goals would be nice, but on a team where offense is apparently not the end-game, I'll take a good attitude and high-energy for sure.
#13 - Nikolai Zherdev. If not for Nikolai Zherdev, this team would be a lot more boring. There. I said it. Call me biased, and honestly if you've kept up with my blog at all, you might think I am, but Z is one of the few people on this team that remind me about what is and can be good about the sport I love. Passion. Dazzle-me skill. A want to play and a desire to make a sick move. He can. He does. If not squashed by a system - or a lack thereof - I think we'd be treated to even more of the good things Z has to offer. But think about it. If not for Z, who is leading the team in points, where would this team who is literally un-able to score, - where would they be??
The Better Than Average.
#5 - Dan Girardi. Solidly the #3 defensemen, there is not much to complain about with Dan's game. Not much to go ooo-wow about either, but not much to complain about. I feel bad but Girardi is just there for me. He's not their best d man. But he's solid. And on a team where you so often stand out on defense for the wrong reasons, I appreciate Girardi. And you know what's more, he's young. And he, hopefully, will only get better. If he could (of would be allowed to) gain some offensive prowess, he'd be a lot more impressive.
#15 - Blair Betts. Now, I know. I know. I was on this guy in pre-season. I also last year and the year before really defended the guy. He is under-rated and extremely under-valued. He does exactly what is expected of him. He deserves more goals. He deserves more in general. Like so many others, he's boring. But you know what, the Rangers have in him a great PKer and a great faceoff guy. If that's what they wanted, that's what they got. I still think that the Rangers could have benefitted and should have given one Czech player who had a great camp (yes, Petr Nedved) a shot on this team. But Betts consistency this year (and before it) has made me realize I didn't want Petr instead of Betts, but rather Petr instead of one of our more over-hyped over-priced American centers. Hell, Betts has shown more moves than Drury or Gomez combined and has already potted more goals this year than he did last year so to complain about him would be unwarranted.
#91 - Markus Naslund. You might be saying, $4 million for this guy. But I'm saying, yes $4 for this guy is fine in my book. He shows more heart than our captain and his fellow assistant. He shows when he's angry. He sticks up for his teammates, verbally. He's not a bad guy to have around. And despite his bad +/-, he is one of the few scorers the Rangers have. He can play with most people. And I honestly think his numbers would be even better is someone would set him up. He still has a pretty shot which he should use more. I may miss our Czech contingent, but I do not regret the Rangers getting Naslund. One of the few big name free-agent moves (or the non-big name free-agent moves) I do not regret.
The Good For What They Are Good For:
#28 - Colton Orr. No one expected Orr to be a scoring jaugernaut. And no one expected him to do anything fancy. He's done neither. But he has improved both his skating and his puck handling ability. And both should be credited. I do think the playing every game and playing only five minutes a night is wearing thin. I feel there are times he does not need to be dressed. When the Rangers have Mara, Dubinsky, Voros, Callahan, and a handful of guys that will scrap when necessary, I do not think we need Orr against teams that are not NY, NJ, Philly, Ottawa, etc. I think the other guys can do that job. But at the same time, Orr is not a liability. He literally is what he is. And I can't fault him for that.
The Started Fast and Slowed Down:
#34 - Aaron Voros. I lauded this guy in the beginning of the year for being "my kinda Ranger." And he is. He still is. But, unfortunately, the scoring went from mad-crazy to non-existent. Remember when he was leading the league in scoring? What happened to the standing in front of the net to get garbage goals? It worked. Surely he'd slow down, as expected. But there does not seem to be much left in the wake of that. I like him. I do. Good team guy, good attitude. And a better personality than most. But there has to be something more. And right now, without the ability to wreck havoc a la one Sean Avery, or PK or PP, he is not really worth his spot right now. Perhaps that's why he finallly came out. I wish he'd be the guy on the Playstation Line again, I really do. But right now, I'm just not sure.
I'm exhausted and have been writing wayyyyy too long right now. So, with that, I'm going to bed. But, a preview of tomorrow's part two where I will go over:
The Mis-Used:
The Over-Priced:
See if you can guess who.
Til tomorrow.
Peace.
But before too much time passes, I wanted to kinda give a rundown/summary of the players on the Rangers and how their 1st "half" of the season has been going in my opinion. You will not ever see me doing grades for something like this, because grades are so, well how do you really quantify them. So I won't try. Instead you get rambling mess. With that, here we go.
The Great:
#30 - Henrik Lundqvist. If not for Hank, and his play in October and November, this team would not be over .500. This team would be, honestly, they'd probably be near the bottom of the conference in my opinion. For a while they could not score more than 2 goals. Hank, while not even having his "BEST" year perhaps, has done all he can do and more to keep them in the race, and keep them in that race with actually a stellar record. Stellar in comparison to their form of play that is. All due credit to Hank. And if the Rangers defense hadn't played so horrifically and had helped him to a shutout or two (he's still at zero for the year, folks), I'd think after 3 years of consequtive nominations, he'd be in good shape for the Vezina. (Although Tim Thomas and the ever-stellar Evgeni Nabakovmight have something to say about that).
#18 - Marc Staal. If there is a bright light on the Rangers defense and a bright light for the future of the Rangers organization, it is this guy. Poised beyond his years, Staal is one of the few players on the Rangers to not only not make mistakes, but to actually seem to grow and improve at a rapid pace. He's young, all of 21-years-old, and he plays like he's been doing it for 10 years. He's also one of the few guys to keep his promises from before the season. He said he had made a committment to getting stronger and to hitting and finishing his checks. That guy has done nothing but remain committed to that. That commitment shows AND it's been effective. I admire that so much. If I had to pick a favorite player, he'd be it. He is not Brian Leetch. He will not be Brian Leetch. He's not in that mold. But if he could and would add a little offense, he'd be more than Rangers fans can ask for. And honestly, he already is. A pleasure to watch.
The Good:
#40 - Steve Valiquette. Steve Valiquette is one of the few players I truly admire on this Rangers squad right now. A funny guy with a great mind and an eloquent way of speaking, he's entertaining in all degrees. He also happens to be a genuinely great backup. And I still, along with others, agree he could start in this league. The Rangers tend not to use him so much, but I am thrilled they have used him more so far this year. He is rarely the reason they lose. I mean, sure, people can look at that Toronto melt-down and say, he could have had some of those five goals in under six minutes. But I really feel sometimes there are just collapses - team wide - and you cannot stop the bleeding. He's not perfect, but you know what. He's damn good.
#27 - Paul Mara. Great team guy. This guy took less money to play for NY. He wanted to be a Ranger. And he plays like he knows what that truly means. I only wish more of his teammates would understand and emulate that behavior. A guy who is not a defensive liability. A guy who will stick up - words and gloves - and do the job, as needed. Just a really big bargain. Also happens to be very funny, which on a team of cookie-cutter bores, helps a great deal, let me tell you. I'd take 2 more Paul Mara's. I really would.
#24 - Ryan Callahan. If I'd take 2 more Paul Mara's, I'd take 4 more Ryan Callahans. With a scoring touch. That's Callahan's only problem - one the whole team suffers from right now it seems - and that's that he can't seem to score as much as he should or even deserves to. I'll check after a game and see how many hits Callahan has and be amazed. There is rarely a game he doesn't skate at 100%, hitting everything, forechecking, and being quick on the puck. A great attitude. And someone you wouldn't mind paying because you know you are getting your money's worth. Sure, more goals would be nice, but on a team where offense is apparently not the end-game, I'll take a good attitude and high-energy for sure.
#13 - Nikolai Zherdev. If not for Nikolai Zherdev, this team would be a lot more boring. There. I said it. Call me biased, and honestly if you've kept up with my blog at all, you might think I am, but Z is one of the few people on this team that remind me about what is and can be good about the sport I love. Passion. Dazzle-me skill. A want to play and a desire to make a sick move. He can. He does. If not squashed by a system - or a lack thereof - I think we'd be treated to even more of the good things Z has to offer. But think about it. If not for Z, who is leading the team in points, where would this team who is literally un-able to score, - where would they be??
The Better Than Average.
#5 - Dan Girardi. Solidly the #3 defensemen, there is not much to complain about with Dan's game. Not much to go ooo-wow about either, but not much to complain about. I feel bad but Girardi is just there for me. He's not their best d man. But he's solid. And on a team where you so often stand out on defense for the wrong reasons, I appreciate Girardi. And you know what's more, he's young. And he, hopefully, will only get better. If he could (of would be allowed to) gain some offensive prowess, he'd be a lot more impressive.
#15 - Blair Betts. Now, I know. I know. I was on this guy in pre-season. I also last year and the year before really defended the guy. He is under-rated and extremely under-valued. He does exactly what is expected of him. He deserves more goals. He deserves more in general. Like so many others, he's boring. But you know what, the Rangers have in him a great PKer and a great faceoff guy. If that's what they wanted, that's what they got. I still think that the Rangers could have benefitted and should have given one Czech player who had a great camp (yes, Petr Nedved) a shot on this team. But Betts consistency this year (and before it) has made me realize I didn't want Petr instead of Betts, but rather Petr instead of one of our more over-hyped over-priced American centers. Hell, Betts has shown more moves than Drury or Gomez combined and has already potted more goals this year than he did last year so to complain about him would be unwarranted.
#91 - Markus Naslund. You might be saying, $4 million for this guy. But I'm saying, yes $4 for this guy is fine in my book. He shows more heart than our captain and his fellow assistant. He shows when he's angry. He sticks up for his teammates, verbally. He's not a bad guy to have around. And despite his bad +/-, he is one of the few scorers the Rangers have. He can play with most people. And I honestly think his numbers would be even better is someone would set him up. He still has a pretty shot which he should use more. I may miss our Czech contingent, but I do not regret the Rangers getting Naslund. One of the few big name free-agent moves (or the non-big name free-agent moves) I do not regret.
The Good For What They Are Good For:
#28 - Colton Orr. No one expected Orr to be a scoring jaugernaut. And no one expected him to do anything fancy. He's done neither. But he has improved both his skating and his puck handling ability. And both should be credited. I do think the playing every game and playing only five minutes a night is wearing thin. I feel there are times he does not need to be dressed. When the Rangers have Mara, Dubinsky, Voros, Callahan, and a handful of guys that will scrap when necessary, I do not think we need Orr against teams that are not NY, NJ, Philly, Ottawa, etc. I think the other guys can do that job. But at the same time, Orr is not a liability. He literally is what he is. And I can't fault him for that.
The Started Fast and Slowed Down:
#34 - Aaron Voros. I lauded this guy in the beginning of the year for being "my kinda Ranger." And he is. He still is. But, unfortunately, the scoring went from mad-crazy to non-existent. Remember when he was leading the league in scoring? What happened to the standing in front of the net to get garbage goals? It worked. Surely he'd slow down, as expected. But there does not seem to be much left in the wake of that. I like him. I do. Good team guy, good attitude. And a better personality than most. But there has to be something more. And right now, without the ability to wreck havoc a la one Sean Avery, or PK or PP, he is not really worth his spot right now. Perhaps that's why he finallly came out. I wish he'd be the guy on the Playstation Line again, I really do. But right now, I'm just not sure.
I'm exhausted and have been writing wayyyyy too long right now. So, with that, I'm going to bed. But, a preview of tomorrow's part two where I will go over:
The Mis-Used:
The Over-Priced:
See if you can guess who.
Til tomorrow.
Peace.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
